Henry Moseley and the Nuclear Treasure Chest

by Nicholas Mee on July 30, 2020

Follow the grand historical axis through Paris from the Arc de Triomphe, along the Champs Élysées, through the Place de la Concorde and the Tuilleries Gardens and you will arrive at the spectacular glass Louvre Pyramid. This crystalline entrance to the Louvre Museum, modelled on the pyramids of Ancient Egypt, unites the antique and the modern in a single elegant structure.

The Louvre Museum

Hidden fifteen metres underground directly beneath the pyramid is a particle accelerator with the ability to reveal the secrets of the treasures of antiquity. This machine is known as AGLAE (Accélérateur Grand Louvre d’analyse élémentaire). 

The Seated Scribe under analysis from AGLAE.

To understand what is going on in the heart of Paris we must travel back in time just over a century to the bustling industrial city of Manchester.

The Rutherford Planetary Atom

Between March and July 1912 the young Danish theorist Niels Bohr (1885-1962) worked with Ernest Rutherford’s team at the University of Manchester. Rutherford’s model of the atom had been published the previous year and his team were busily studying its structure. During these critical months Bohr realised that the new quantum ideas of Planck and Einstein might provide a foundation for understanding the atom.

Albert Square, Manchester by Adolphe Valette (1910).

In Rutherford’s scheme atoms were formed of a tiny positively charged nucleus orbited by negatively charged electrons. The nucleus of the simplest atom—hydrogen—carried a single positive electric charge and was orbited by a single electron. Bohr devised a mathematical model of the atom in which electrons could only occupy a fixed series of energy levels. They could be boosted to a higher energy level by absorbing a photon of light with just the right energy. They could also drop down to a lower energy level emitting a photon to take away the energy difference between the two levels.

Bohr’s ideas offered a qualitative understanding of spectroscopy, a technique that enabled astronomers to determine the chemical make-up of the stars by matching the dark spectral lines seen in light from the stars to the bright spectral emission lines observed in the laboratory. Even more remarkable was the numerical agreement between the wavelengths of the lines in the hydrogen spectrum and the predictions of Bohr’s model of the hydrogen atom. This precise correspondence demonstrated the fundamental validity of Bohr’s model and Bohr was rewarded with the 1922 Nobel Prize in Physics.

Bohr’s groundbreaking work was soon followed by another application of his model that is less well known. It was made by Henry Moseley who joined Rutherford’s team in Manchester after graduating from Oxford in 1910. Moseley contribution would result in a major step forward in understanding the structure of atoms and in explaining the Periodic Table of the Elements.

X-ray Spectra

When Russian chemist Dmitri Mendeleyev (1834–1907) devised the Periodic Table he arranged the elements in order of increasing atomic mass, and this was still how the table was organised in the early years of the twentieth century.

The Periodic Table (1871)

But in 1913 a Dutch physicist Anton van den Broek (1870-1926) suggested that perhaps the elements should be ordered by nuclear charge rather than atomic mass. Moseley took up the challenge of testing whether this was true. Bombarding a pure sample of an element causes it to emit X-rays of a characteristic wavelength. This is just like the visible light spectrum of an element, but with much higher energy electromagnetic radiation. Moseley assumed correctly that this happens when one of the innermost electrons is knocked out of the atom leaving a vacancy in an inner orbital. This vacancy is then filled by an electron from a higher energy orbital with the emission of an X-ray photon that carries away the energy difference between the two orbitals.

Moseley systematically bombarded pure samples of each element with an electron beam and determined the wavelength of the emitted X-rays by measuring their angle of deflection when passed through a crystal. He interpreted these results by adapting Bohr’s formula for the electron energy levels to give a relationship between the nuclear charge of an atom and the energy of the emitted X-rays. This enabled him to deduce the nuclear charge of each element. These results were summarised in the first part of a two-part paper where Moseley wrote:

We have here a proof that there is in the atom a fundamental quantity, which increases by regular steps as we pass from one element to the next. The quantity can only be the charge on the central positive nucleus

But by November 1913 the Manchester weather and the thick yellow smog had become too much for Moseley. He returned to Oxford and continued his work there. 

Henry Moseley in his laboratory in Oxford.

Moseley analysed the X-ray spectra of each element from aluminium to gold, and by the following April he had submitted the second part of his paper. His brilliant experimental work had shown that the nucleus of an atom carries a charge that is a multiple of the charge on the hydrogen nucleus. This multiple is known as the atomic number. And he had conclusively demonstrated that the elements should be ordered by atomic number not atomic mass. 

Chemical Anomalies

Moseley noted that this resolved three anomalies in the Periodic Table where the positions of two elements were switched to match their chemical properties. Ever since Mendeleyev, chemists had swapped the positions of iodine and tellurium because, even although iodine has a lower atomic mass than tellurium, it was clear that it belongs in Group VII with the halogens, whereas tellurium belongs in Group VI beneath selenium. The need for this sleight of hand was now removed as Moseley showed that iodine has atomic number 53, whereas tellurium has atomic number 52. Moseley accounted for similar switches in the cases of argon and potassium, and cobalt and nickel.

Moseley also concluded that three elements were missing between element-13 aluminium and element-79 gold. These elements would have atomic numbers 43, 61 and 75. In subsequent decades each would be tracked down. They are known as technetium, promethium and rhenium.

The Element Celtium

Moseley also suggested that the element celtium, announced by Georges Urbain in 1911, required further investigation. Moseley suspected that celtium might be element-72. But you won’t find celtium in the Periodic Table today. Following the publication of Moseley’s paper, Urbain visited Oxford and Moseley tested a sample of his celtium. There was no sign of any lines in the X-ray spectrum corresponding to atomic number 72. Urbain returned to France disappointed, but amazed that Moseley was able to complete his analysis in a single day. Element-72 was eventually isolated in 1923. It is known as hafnium.

The modern Periodic Table of the Elements

The Proton

Moseley’s results almost screamed out that the nucleus contains a particle with opposite but equal charge to the electron. At least this conclusion seems obvious in hindsight. Three years on, in 1917, Rutherford blasted nitrogen with alpha particles and liberated positively charged particles from the nitrogen nuclei. He named them protons.

The discovery of the proton represented a major leap forward. Atomic number is simply the number of protons in the nucleus. It was now clear how this number determines the atom’s chemical properties. Each proton carries one unit of positive electric charge. In a neutral atom this charge is balanced by an equal number of orbiting electrons, each carrying one unit of negative electric charge. Electrons are responsible for chemically bonding atoms together into molecules and solids, but the electric charge of the nucleus determines the number of electrons available to form these bonds. 

The Great War

In August 1914 war broke out and Moseley volunteered for the Royal Engineers, leaving for the Dardanelles in June 1915. Two months later he was killed by a sniper’s bullet during the Gallipoli campaign. He was 27. There is little doubt that Moseley deserved a Nobel Prize for his work. But Nobel Prizes are never awarded posthumously.

The magnitude of Moseley’s discoveries can be judged from a surprising comment Bohr made to an interviewer in 1962. According to Bohr, prior to Moseley’s work no one took Rutherford’s planetary atom seriously:

There was no mention of it in any place. The great change came from Moseley.


Votive crown of the Visigoth King Recceswinth. Part of the Guarrazar Treasure.

Hidden Treasures

Beneath the pyramid outside the Louvre precious artefacts are interrogated with proton beams using a technique known as PIXE (Particle Induced X-ray Emission) to reveal their atomic constituents and identify their origins. The Louvre scientists are following in Moseley’s footsteps, using his methods to investigate the chemical composition of artworks such as stained glass from the windows of Chartres Cathedral, a solid gold scabbard donated to Napoleon Bonaparte by the French Republic and the eyes of a sculpted Ancient Egyptian scribe. AGLAE has also analysed the Guarrazar treasure discovered near Toledo in Spain in 1859 and dating back to the seventh century Visigoths. This spectacular treasure contains golden crowns and crosses decorated with pearls, emeralds, garnets and sapphires from locations as distant as Sri Lanka.


Further Information

There is more about AGLAE here: The accelerator in the Louvre.


The Atomic Bomb Ring

by Nicholas Mee on July 25, 2020

The idea that matter is composed of vast quantities of atoms dates back all the way to the Ancient Greek philosophers Leucippus and Democritus in the fifth century BC. They proposed that the world around us is ultimately composed of indivisible entities they called atoms from the Greek ‘a’ meaning ‘not’ and ‘tomí’ meaning ‘to cut’. But atoms, as we know them today, definitely do have subcomponents, so it certainly is possible to split the atom. Indeed, in 1947 an American cereal company Kix offered anyone with fifteen cents and the top off a cereal box the chance to see atoms splitting right before their eyes.

An advert for the Atomic Bomb Ring from Kix cereals.

Incredibly, the Atomic Bomb Ring really did allow the children of the atomic age to witness the decay of atomic nuclei as they munched their breakfast cereal. Attached to the ring was a bullet-shaped capsule that separated into two halves. As the advert says, one half contained a secret message compartment, but the other half ‘the warhead’ contained a hidden atom chamber. This silver chamber was a device invented four decades earlier by renowned British physicist Sir William Crookes.

The Atomic Bomb Ring

Scintillations of Fire

Crookes is remembered for his development of an electrical discharge tube—the Crookes tube—which played a key role in the discovery of both X-rays and the electron. It would later evolve into a fundamental component of old CRT television sets and computer monitors.

In 1903 Crookes had obtained a tiny sample of radium, which at the time was the most valuable substance on Earth. The newly-discovered radium was highly radioactive and its mysteries were still being revealed by researchers. Crookes held a screen coated with zinc sulphide close to the sample and the rays emitted by the radium would cause it to glow. While studying this effect Crookes spilt some of his precious sample, so he searched for specks of radium with his zinc sulphide screen, holding a magnifying lens to see any faint glow on the screen. But rather than a faint continuous glow, he could see individual flashes of light. Crookes was astonished, each flash was produced by a single alpha particle emitted by an atom of radium.

Sir William Crookes in 1906

Crookes turned his discovery into an amusing toy so that others could see the wonders of the atom. At one end of a brass tube he fitted a zinc sulfide screen with a speck of radium salt on a needle tip about one millimetre in front. Then the sparkling display on the screen could be viewed through a lens from the other end of the tube. By turning a screw the distance between screen and radium sample could be gradually altered. Crookes described the effect of such an adjustment in The Chemical News (Crookes 1903):

When the scintillating points are few there is no residual phosphorescence to be seen, and the sparks succeeding each other appear like stars on a black sky.
On bringing the radium nearer the screen the scintillations become more numerous and brighter, until when close together the flashes follow each other so quickly that the surface looks like a turbulent luminous sea.

Crookes gave his remarkable little instrument a suitably wondrous name. He called it a spinthariscope, taking inspiration from the Greek word for spark or scintillate (spítha) in these lines from the Homeric Hymn to Apollo:

Here from the ship leaped far-darting Apollo
Like a star at
midday, while from him flitted scintillations of fire,
And the brilliancy reached to heaven.

Spinthariscopes are still available today, but they no longer contain radium. The image below is a spinthariscope manufactured by United Nuclear. It contains a tiny sample of radioactive thorium ore from a mine near Great Bear Lake in Canada.

Modern spinthariscope are available from United Nuclear

The Structure of the Atom

Although Crookes thought of the spinthariscope simply as an amusing toy, it would play an important role in physics. The spinthariscope was the basis for an experiment proposed by Ernest Rutherford at the University of Manchester in 1908. Rutherford suggested that Hans Geiger and Ernest Marsden should investigate the effects of bombarding gold foil with high-energy alpha particles from a radioactive source. The tool they used to study the alpha particles was essentially a spinthariscope. 

Sitting in a darkened room Geiger and Marsden counted the flashes produced by alpha particles hitting a zinc sulphide screen following their encounters with gold atoms in the foil. This was one of the most important experiments in the history of physics as it enabled Rutherford to deduce that almost all the mass of an atom is located in a tiny nucleus that is surrounded by orbiting electrons. Crookes had given physicists the key to the Nuclear Age.

We now know that each flash seen in a spinthariscope follows the transmutation of an atomic nucleus as it undergoes radioactive decay by emitting a high-energy alpha particle. In the spinthariscope offered by United Nuclear each decay transforms a nucleus of element number 90 thorium into a nucleus of element number 88 radium. Furthermore, the emitted alpha particle is formed of two protons and two neutrons and is identical to the nucleus of a helium atom. So it wasn’t just the sight of splitting atoms that was on offer with a Kix cereal packet, but the splitting of the tiny atomic nucleus.

Further Information

There is more about the spinthariscopes available from United Nuclear at the following link:

There is more about the Geiger-Marsden experiment here:


Julia Dream

July 20, 2019

Many naturally occurring objects have a complicated appearance, and when we look closer the complexity only increases. As we zoom in we see what appear to be miniature replicas of the original object. For instance, a branch of a fir tree might resemble a scaled down version of an entire fir tree, and a broccoli […]

Read the full article →

Sex and the Cosmos

June 2, 2019

Looking up at a clear night sky can be quite overwhelming. It puts the world into perspective and invites some deep reflection. Two big questions have puzzled humanity through the ages. What are the stars made of? And just how vast is the universe? The philosophers of classical Greece 2400 years ago offered some speculative […]

Read the full article →

What Does a Black Hole Look Like?

April 21, 2019

Black holes were once just the outlandish speculations of theoretical physicists. Now we know they really are out there. Gravitational waves produced by the collision and merger of black holes have been detected as faint ripples in the fabric of space. And now we even have a picture of a distant supermassive black hole. So […]

Read the full article →

All Eyes on the Centre of the Galaxy

April 2, 2019

The image below shows a beautiful region of the night sky in the constellation Sagittarius. The asterism known to amateur astronomers as the ‘teapot’ forms part of the constellation. This is rather apt as the many nebulae and gas clouds located towards the centre of the galaxy appear as steam rising from the spout of the […]

Read the full article →

Revolutions in Science

January 31, 2019

I was recently interviewed by Oxford University Press about my new book The Cosmic Mystery Tour. This is part of the interview filmed in Oxford in October 2018. ??

Read the full article →

Bagels, Knots and Sculpture

December 23, 2018

This is a short video about some of the Symbolic Sculpture animations that I created some years ago with the sculptor John Robinson. ?? There are more videos on The Cosmic Mystery Tour YouTube Channel. Please don’t forget to subscribe to the YouTube channel.  

Read the full article →

Neutrinos, Quarks and Leon Lederman

November 9, 2018

Leon Lederman died at the age of 96 on 3 October 2018. Lederman was one of the leading particle physicists of the twentieth century and a key architect of the Standard Model. Working with Melvin Schwartz and Jack Steinberger at Brookhaven Laboratory in New York in 1962, Lederman was co-discoverer of the second type of […]

Read the full article →

The Cosmic Mystery Tour

October 20, 2018

My new book The Cosmic Mystery Tour is an illustrated account of cutting-edge science with brief stories of the quirky characters who made it possible. The universe is full of wondrous and beautiful places, but this is not just a sight-seeing trip. We will investigate how the universe works. What makes it tick! It is a […]

Read the full article →